[Reviewer: Nigel Smellie]
Case Study 3. Accessible Online Training for Health Care Professionals (HCP) (University of Central Lancashire – Health Sciences and Practice)
1. General Description of Case Study by Reviewer.
• Distributed e-learning course to support widely spread group of professionals.
• Diabetes Education Online (DEOL) – has run for 4 years, numbers are increasing and is now and integral part of diabetes teaching and learning strategy.
• Content developed and delivered using in-house expertise.
• Considered successful – external examiners, validation panels and service user forums commented positively on course and highlighted some as examples of ‘best practice’.
• Pilot project that acted as a catalyst across the university, leading to development of institutional e-learning strategy.
• Introduction partly funded by students having to pay to access online resources.
2. JISC Classification:
a. e-Learning Activity Area: Learning Resources and Activities (LRA).
b. e-Learning Benefits Model: TOP CENTRE of the graph:
(1) E-Learning Approach (Y-Axis): “transformational”; improve sustainability (JISC 2008a, p29).
(2) Nature of the issue (X-Axis): level of definition half-way between “well-defined” and “complex; driven by pedagogy; measured in pass rates; evidenced by effective pedagogy.
3. Rationale for Change:
• Increased demand for diabetes training.
• Need to provide broader access.
4. Learning, Learners and Staff Involved:
a. Learning and Learners:
• Subject matter - diabetes
• 8 units of problem-based learning, each delivered weekly – total of 32 case studies
• Constructivist approach – synchronous and asynchronous discussions, e-mails, chat rooms etc, supported by comprehensive online reference resources (including video and animation).
• 20 students per year – cohorts of 10-15 healthcare professionals.
b. Staff:
(1) Setting up project:
• 2 x senior lecturers (one nursing and one e-learning technology)
• 1 x project manager
• 1 x associate head (for supervision/executive decisions)
• Support from Learning Development Unit.
(2) Running each module:
• 1 x lecturer module leader (36 hours)
• 1 x lecturer practitioner (18 hours)
• Online and telephone support from library distance learning unit
5. Technology and Resources Used:
a. Technology:
• Managed learning environment (MLE) - Web CT (versions 4 and 6)
• Dreamweaver (for building) and Course genie, Breeze (for updating) website.
b. Resources: Specific costs not identified/recorded in case study report.
6. Possible Innovation Identified: Nothing especially innovative per se, but within this particular institution this was a novel approach – “early adopter”.
7. Benefits Claimed:
a. Administrators/wider organisation:
• Approach fulfilled requirement for increased throughput/wider access.
• Project was a successful example for others to emulate.
• Project led to establishment of ‘animation repository’ in collaboration with Learning Development Unit.
• Pilot project acted as a catalyst to establish institution steering group and subsequent development of University Strategy for e-learning.
b. Academics:
• Staff satisfaction with, and understanding of, e-learning improved.
c. Students:
• More flexible & broader access (including international students)
• Improved enjoyment/motivation.
• Personal development - improved IT and communication skills.
8. Lessons Identified:
• In development phase, gaining understanding between academic and technical staff was time-consuming.
• Under-estimated time commitment for staff supporting modules – lecturers may spend 60-70 in support responding to chat rooms/e-mails (eg 320-360 postings from a cohort of 10-15 students).
• Modifications needed to be made to some course elements to encourage use (eg chatrooms, formative assessments).
• Lack of contact by struggling students
9. Additional Comments by Reviewer:
Although not especially innovative, per se, this case study was ground-breaking in context, setting the conditions for enhanced use of e-learning across the institution. The size and scope of this project indicates that it could be a model for some of the training undertaken in the armed forces – updating professional skills in a work-based environment.
(580 words)
10. References:
JISC (2008a), Exploring Tangible Benefits of e-Learning: Does Investment yield interest?
I've moved my blog
-
I've moved my blog to http://emmanugent.wordpress.com/
I've been testing differnt blog suppliers and prefer this one. If you are
following me, please chang...
17 years ago
Hi Nigel,
ReplyDeleteWhy do you think it is that most Uni's seem to underestimate the time it will need to run a programme. This seems to be a common thread and no one seems to allow time. I understand with innovation we have to 'tweak' things, but this project had nothing new per se. Any ideas why they continue to underestimate?